|
What is the Capital Improvement Program? Beginning
in January 1996, the Chicago Public Schools (CPS)
established a five-year Capital Improvement Program
(CIP) to renovate school buildings in disrepair, upgrade
school facilities, and carry out new construction
to alleviate overcrowding or replace old, unsafe school
buildings. The formal opportunity for public input
into CIP requests has been through CPS’ annual
Spring capital budget hearings, where schools and
parents have an opportunity to explain the basis for
capital requests in hopes of receiving funds to meet
their schools’ needs. In the end, the Chicago
Public Schools, without a community advisory panel
(dissolved in 1999), determines as to which schools
will receive funding based on three broad goals, as
follows:
- Relieve Overcrowding through new school construction
- Provide school building Renovations and Rehabilitation
upgrades
- Provide Educational Enhancements (i.e. Playlots,
campus parks, site improvements, lockers, etc.)
CPS’ FY 2004 Capital Improvement Program
Allocations
| Project Type |
Budget (millions) |
 |
| New Construction |
$ 113.4 |
| Renovation & Capital Maint. |
$ 185 |
| Contingency |
$ 20.8 |
| Administration |
$ 20.5 |
| Transfer to Prior Year Projects |
$ 35.1 |
| TOTAL |
$374.8 |
This is $137 million less than last year’s
budget! |
|
Of the major construction projects, only one new school
was fully-funded: A shared school for Langston Hughes
& Davis Center. The Langston Hughes & Davis
community had been organizing the past few years, but
false promises from CPS remained just that. With support
from NCBG, this past winter and spring the Langston
Hughes parents organized and made public the horrid
building conditions and overcrowding at Langston Hughes
School. Only after this Far South Side Roseland school
appeared on Fox 32 News’ Perspective followed
by a Chicago Sun-Times column both questioning the facility
conditions these children are forced to learn in AND
how this school had fallen between the cracks one too
many times despite the promises…. The new school
is finally funded!
But, schools in NEED should NOT have to fight this
hard…. CPS’ building assessments, outstanding
code violations, overcrowding, & overall NEED
should determine CPS’ spending priorities.
Funded Construction Projects
| Additional new partially
funded schools: |
Brighton Park Area |
$2.6 million |
Clinton/Boone Area |
$3.2 million |
| Fairfield |
$2.5 million |
| Lee/Pasteur Area |
$2.5 million |
| Miles Davis |
$5.4 million |
Southwest Side HS |
$3.6 million |
|
Twain School, currently the most overcrowded elementary
school in Chicago (167%), will receive a $16 million
Addition. However, will this be enough, and how long
will it take CPS to build the other partially-funded
new schools for the Southwest Side—the most
overcrowded region? What about other overcrowded neighborhoods,
like on the Northwest and Far South Sides? Does CPS
have a strategy & will these partially-funded
schools have money for completion in a timely manner?
How Much Has Been Spent?
Since Spring 2003, CPS has invested more than $3.4
billion towards improving our schools; however, more
than $2 billion worth of capital projects remain un-funded!
Thanks to another $500 million allocation from our
State legislators, Chicago received an additional
$100 million for Fiscal Year 2004.
However, recently Governor Rod Blagojevich cautioned
that he could no longer provide new funds for the
future State School Construction Program, unless specific
funding sources are identified. Since we know that
there will always be a need for ongoing capital funds
and a capital program, and this program has been successful
all across the state, in urban and rural areas, we
must ensure that funding is made available next year.
This is why it is crucial to encourage our elected
officials to prioritize funds for school construction
all across Illinois so that those schools that fell
between the cracks will not be neglected in years
to come.
Additionally, we think that there are Alternative
Creative Financing Opportunities. Just this past summer
2003, the City’s Budget Department announced
$100 million may be available through Tax Increment
Financing (TIF) revenue to build schools. Simeon Career
Academy, which celebrated its ribbon cutting on September
2nd, is a great example of the first TIF expansion
for the sole purpose of benefiting a neighborhood
school!
The ritzy Lakeshore East development, along Wacker
Drive and Lake Shore Drive, will provide dedicated
land and funding to build a new CPS school and park
for the neighborhood. Similarly, a housing developer
near Ogden School on the Near North Side would like
to replace the old Ogden School with a new school
for the new community. So we know that if there is
a will, there is a way! We want to know why CPS can’t
get developers to build schools in our neediest communities
and with our input?
NCBG believes that CPS should be better coordinating
its capital planning efforts with the City’s
Planning Department and the Chicago Housing Authority’s
Transformation plan, and demand that as developers
transform and re-populate some of our poorest neighborhoods,
these housing developers should contribute to building
replacement schools or repairing the older, neglected
schools for the children who in these communities
today, not after the families have all been “priced”
out.
The Future of the CPS Capital Improvement Program
relies on funds and a “smarter” short-
and long-term strategic Facility Master Plan. Neighborhood
Capital Budget Group (NCBG) is committed to working
with school and community leaders to craft a citywide
“Facility Master Plan” for the Chicago
Public Schools to foster and maintain community engagement
in facility planning and management, embody a public
policy both recognizing and actively supporting the
role school facilities play in anchoring healthy,
viable communities. The ultimate goal of good facilities
planning and design is to meet every community’s
need for an adequate education for all students and
ensure full and equal educational opportunity for
all. Furthermore:
- To guarantee fairness and ensure the safety of
students and teachers, the ranking and prioritizing
of school capital projects should be based on building
assessments, overcrowding conditions, assessment
of potential enhancements for building usage, and
enforcement of health and safety codes.
- Schools serve as anchors and centers of community;
all should have the opportunity for meaningful community
engagement and participation in decision-making
throughout all phases of capital projects.
- Facilities planning should be coordinated with
community economic and redevelopment plans, neighborhood
demographic shifts and patterns, and future projected
community and school needs.
- Facilities planning and design should be driven
by school programming and curriculum needs and goals
(“One size” will not fit all).
For more information or for details on schools who
received funding for capital projects, contact: Andrea
Lee, Schools Initiative Coordinator, OR John Alex
Colon, Schools Associate @ (312) 939-7198; www.ncbg.org
|