Facts About the Schools
Improvement List and CPS' Intervention Strategies:
- 179 Elementary Schools on the State's School
Improvement List as a result of the Federal
No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act. 3 of these
elementary schools are Magnet schools.
- 12 High Schools were added as failing schools
on August 21, 2002, totaling 191 schools.
- 125,000 elementary school students should
have been eligible to transfer to higher performing
schools, but CPS could only identify 2500
available slots in the system.
- CPS decided that only 50 of these 179 schools
could be eligible to transfer students to
higher performing schools due to space shortage
and application/testing procedures. This
pilot program for transferring students is
through the 1) Pilot Clusters Program, or
2) Pilot Paired Program.
- 141 schools are not eligible to transfer
students. CPS says that high schools on the
list do not have to be given a separate option
to transfer since they're already option schools,
and therefore in any given year, a student
could transfer to the school of their choice
if they meet the criteria and space is available.
- Only 4% of the students eligible to transfer
chose to do so
|
As identified, most of elementary schools from the
School Improvement List are underutilized (52%), where
the building maintains less than 65% capacity. In
other words, as defined by the Chicago Public Schools
(CPS), when looking at the building capacity alone,
one might say there is too much extra space in the
school. Some may even argue that we should close
and consolidate these schools. However, in an era
where districts are moving towards and adopting the
educational theory of "Small Schools," where more
intimate learning and social environments are encouraged,
respectful of small class sizes, more one-on-one student-teacher
contact, and as many researchers point out, a recommended
learning environment for low-performing, low-income,
and minority students, it seems more advisable for
CPS to hold and retain these smaller, underutilized,
and struggling schools. In fact, NCBG considers these
93 "small schools" half-way there. Now it's up to
us to effectively identify adequate resources to truly
provide the best educational environments for teaching
and learning in all of our schools.
When we think about underutilized schools, it is
important to think about the factors that may influence
schools to lose enrollment and how this low enrollment
may help or hinder learning. Often, the immediate
neighborhood has a significant impact on the population
within the schools, which is why it is important to
include schools as an integral piece of community
planning and development. In other words, schools
should be used to anchor and stabilize communities.
Since 95 of these failing schools are considered "underutilized,"
it is likely that neighborhood and social factors
are influencing these schools to lose enrollment,
and instead of punishing the school by allowing resources
to lessen and perhaps closing the school, we must
admit to the value of small, underutilized schools
and engage the school and community to identify the
needs so that high academic performance is achieved.
The concern with overcrowded
schools, where percent capacities exceed 80%
on the other hand must also be noted as burdening
the learning. Overcrowded schools are likely to have
larger class sizes, less direct teacher-student contact,
discipline problems, and even health and safety concerns.
In some overcrowded schools, students are forced
to learn in spaces never meant to be classrooms (such
as hallways or storage rooms), or have important facilities
such as the school library converted into one or more
classrooms just to meet the crush of students. We
know that it is distracting for students to learn
when they are squeezed together, and it is difficult
for the teacher to spend quality learning time with
struggling students when classrooms are overflowing.
17% of the failing elementary schools are overcrowded.
Coupled with additional economic and social factors,
CPS should try to decrease the class sizes so that
children can be given the appropriate attention to
help bring achievement up to grade level.
Since many of these communities are densely populated
and crowded themselves, particularly on the City's
Southwest and Northwest sides, CPS needs to better
plan for and build more schools. While they may say
that children could attend schools elsewhere, the
fact is, students should not have to be forced to
attend a school outside of the neighborhood, whether
due to overcrowding, or a failing school. These situations
must be addressed and solved, permanently.
| Schools by Region1 |
Schools By Percent Capacity2
(Excludes High School Data) |
Schools & Percentages
By Geographic Region3 |
| Region 1 |
3 |
| Region 2 |
32 |
| Region 3 |
50 |
| Region 4 |
29 |
| Region 5 |
48 |
| Region 6 |
29 |
| Total |
191 |
|
| Overcrowded |
30 |
| Severely Overcrowded(>100%) |
11 |
| Overcrowded (80-99%) |
19 |
| Underutilized (<65%) |
93 |
| "Just Right" |
50 |
| Unknown |
6 |
| |
179 |
|
| Far South |
20 |
10.5% |
| North |
6 |
3.1% |
| Northwest |
6 |
3.1% |
| South |
38 |
20.0% |
| Southwest |
52 |
27.2% |
| West |
69 |
36.1% |
| |
191 |
100% |
|
1
Schools identified from Illinois' School Improvement
List, July 2002
2 Enrollment taken from CPS Student
Racial/Ethnic Survey, Reported Sept. 2001; CPS'
% Capacity defined by enrollment/design capacity.
3 Geographic regions defined by the
City of Chicago's Department of Planning and Development. |
|